From the article
"In Classroom of Future, Stagnant Scores" in the The New York Times, 3 Sept 2011.
One broad analysis of laptop programs like the one in Maine, for
example, found that such programs are not a major factor in student
performance.
“Rather than being a cure-all or silver bullet, one-to-one laptop
programs may simply amplify what’s already occurring — for better or
worse,” wrote Bryan Goodwin, spokesman for Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning, a nonpartisan group that did the study, in an essay.
Good teachers, he said, can make good use of computers, while bad
teachers won’t, and they and their students could wind up becoming
distracted by the technology.
A review by the Education Department
in 2009 of research on online courses — which more than one million
K-12 students are taking — found that few rigorous studies had been done
and that policy makers “lack scientific evidence” of their
effectiveness.. A division
of the Education Department that rates classroom curriculums has found
that much educational software is not an improvement over textbooks.
Larry Cuban, an education professor emeritus at Stanford University,
said the research did not justify big investments by districts
“There is insufficient evidence to spend that kind of money. Period,
period, period,” he said. “There is no body of evidence that shows a
trend line.”
No comments:
Post a Comment